Birmingham Restaurant Inspection Data: Ratings, Areas & Freshness

Live report. The measurements below are calculated from Cooked’s current copy of the official UK Food Standards Agency + West Midlands councils feed and refresh after new data is ingested.

How to read this report

One row means one operating establishment or permit in the source—not necessarily one company. A restaurant with several separately permitted counters can appear more than once, while a business the authority marks as gone is excluded. Health-department closures remain included because they are active inspection facts.

“Clean”, “mid” and “cooked” are Cooked’s comparison bands; the authority’s own rating remains the source of truth. the FSA rates 0–5 (higher is better): clean = 4 or 5, mid = 3, cooked = 2 or below.

UK Food Standards Agency + West Midlands councils does not publish itemized findings in this feed, so this report never guesses what an inspector found. The local-area table uses only areas with a meaningful rated sample, and the repeated-name table describes matching public names rather than claiming common ownership.

Citywide snapshot

Calculated from the official feed as stored by Cooked on 7 October 2026.

15,564 operating records are in the source snapshot; 12,639 carry a current clean, mid or cooked result.

How fresh are the records?

2,302 records (14.8%) have an inspection or rating date in the last 180 days; 4,982 (32%) are within one year. The median latest-record age is 472 days.

Where cooked records are most concentrated

This ranks only local areas with at least 20 rated records and at least one cooked result. It is a current-record comparison, not a claim about every meal or every business in the area.

Repeated public names with cooked locations

These are exact same-name groups with at least three operating locations, at least two rated locations and at least one cooked result. A shared municipal name does not prove shared ownership.