✕
Friendly Food Market
December 30, 2011 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeLicense Re-Inspection
- failed findings5
- critical findings1
Failed findings
-
certified manager paperwork missingcriticalOfficial wording: Facilities To Maintain Proper TemperatureInspector note: Correct By: Saturday, December 29, 2012 Violation Codes: Inspector Comments: FOUND 4 COOLERS NOT TURNED ON. CRITICAL VIOLATION. NO CITAITON ISSUED.
-
toxic items stored near foodOfficial wording: No Evidence Of Rodent Or Insect Outer Openings Protected/Rodent Proofed, A Written Log Shall Be Maintained Available To The InspectorsInspector note: Correct By: Saturday, December 29, 2012 Violation Codes: Inspector Comments: FOUND REAR EXIT DOOR NOT RODENT PROOFED ON BOTTOM. SERIOUS VIOLATION. NO CITATION ISSUED.
-
Outside Garbage Waste Grease And Storage Area; Clean, Rodent Proof, All Containers CoveredInspector note: Correct By: Saturday, December 29, 2012 Violation Codes: Inspector Comments: FOUND NO OUTSIDE DUMPSTER. SERIOUS VIOLATION. NO CITATION ISSUED.
-
pests in the houseOfficial wording: Ventilation: Rooms And Equipment Vented As Required: Plumbing: Installed And MaintainedInspector note: FOUND 4 COMPARTMNET SINK AND EXPOSED HAND SINK NOT INSTALLED COMPLETELY.4 COMPARTMENT SINK MUST HAVE ATTACHED DRAINBOARD. (NO FAUCETS/DRAINAGE PIPING).
-
grimy wiping clothsOfficial wording: Premises Maintained Free Of Litter, Unnecessary Articles, Cleaning Equipment Properly StoredInspector note: Correct By: Saturday, December 29, 2012 Violation Codes: Inspector Comments: FOUND CLUTTER AT PREMISES THAT MUST BE REMOVED.(EQUIPMENT, WOOD,ETC.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on December 29, 2011: 1 finding appeared for the first time. 4 findings recurred.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Greater Grand Crossing
About this record
This record comes from Chicago Department of Public Health. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Chicago Data Portal.