✕
Panera Bread
November 23, 2016 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeCanvass Re-Inspection
- failed findings5
- critical findings0
Failed findings
-
toxic items stored near foodOfficial wording: No Evidence Of Rodent Or Insect Outer Openings Protected/Rodent Proofed, A Written Log Shall Be Maintained Available To The InspectorsInspector note: OBSERVED LIVE FRUIT FLIES AT FRONT AND REAR PREP AREAS. APPROXIMATELY 20 LIVE FRUIT FLIES WERE OBSERVED ON THE WALLS, CEILING AND EQUIPMENT IN THESE AREAS. ADDITIONAL PEST CONTROL SERVICE IS NEEDED TO MINIMIZE OR ELIMINATE THE PEST ACTIVITY. ALSO, THE FRONT ENTRANCE DOUBLE DOORS ARE NOT RODENT PROOF. THERE IS A 1/2" GAP AT BOTTOM CENTER OF THE DOORS. MUST MAKE DOOR TIGHT FITTING TO PREVENT PEST ENTRY AND MAINTAIN. SERIOUS VIOLATION 7-38-020.
-
Clean Multi-Use Utensils And Single Service Articles Properly Stored: No Reuse Of Single Service ArticlesInspector note: ALL CLEAN SINGLE SERVICE UTENSILS MUST BE PROPERLY STORED WITH HANDLES UP.
-
Food And Non-Food Contact Surfaces Properly Designed, Constructed And MaintainedInspector note: CUTTING BOARDS WITH DEEP, DARK GROOVES MUST BE SANDED/BLEACHED OR REPLACED.
-
food prep surfaces dirtyOfficial wording: Food And Non-Food Contact Equipment Utensils Clean, Free Of Abrasive DetergentsInspector note: OBSERVED KNOZZLES AND DRIP TRAY AT THE CUSTOMER FOUNTAIN DRINK STATION NOT CLEAN.INSTRUCTED TO CLEAN KNOZZLES,DRIP TRAY IN DETAIL AND MAINTAIN.
-
Floors: Constructed Per Code, Cleaned, Good Repair, Coving Installed, Dust-Less Cleaning Methods UsedInspector note: FLOORS ALONG WALLS AND IN ALL CORNERS THROUGHOUT THE PREMISES INCLUDING FLOOR DRAINS REQUIRE A DETAIL CLEANING.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on November 22, 2016: 5 findings recurred. 1 previous finding did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Near North Side
About this record
This record comes from Chicago Department of Public Health. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Chicago Data Portal.