✕
Rosebud Cafe
April 1, 2016 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeCanvass
- failed findings5
- critical findings0
Failed findings
-
toxic items stored near foodOfficial wording: No Evidence Of Rodent Or Insect Outer Openings Protected/Rodent Proofed, A Written Log Shall Be Maintained Available To The InspectorsInspector note: RAT DROPPINGS (APPROX. 15) NOTED SCATTERED ON FLOOR ALONG WALLBASE IN BASEMENT STORAGE AREA. INSTD TO REMOVE DROPPINGS, CLEAN AND SANITIZE ALL AFFECTED AREAS. RECOMMEND TO CONTACT PEST CONTROL FOR SERVICE. CITATION ISSUED 7-38-020 SERIOUS.
-
Food And Non-Food Contact Surfaces Properly Designed, Constructed And MaintainedInspector note: RUSTY SURFACES ON BOTTOM OF PREP TABLES. INSTD TO REMOVE RUST. INTERIOR PANEL OF ICE MACHINE IN POOR REPAIR, NOT TIGHT FITTING. INSTD TO REPAIR SAME.
-
Walls, Ceilings, Attached Equipment Constructed Per Code: Good Repair, Surfaces Clean And Dust-Less Cleaning MethodsInspector note: WALL PANELS AT BAR AREA IN POOR REPAIR, DAMAGED, ROTTING SURFACES. INSTD TO REPAIR SAME. UNFINISHED WALLS IN EMPLOYEE TOILET ROOM. INSTD TO REPAIR SAME. WALL BEHIND AND CEILING ABOVE 3-COMPARTMENT SINK WITH DUST ACCUMULATION. CLEAN SAME AND MAINTAIN.
-
pests in the houseOfficial wording: Ventilation: Rooms And Equipment Vented As Required: Plumbing: Installed And MaintainedInspector note: 3-COMPARTMENT SINK FAUCET LEAKING. INSTD TO REPAIR SAME. VENTILATION IN EMPLOYEE TOILET ROOM IN POOR REPAIR. INSTD TO REPAIR SAME.
-
Appropriate Method Of Handling Of Food (Ice) Hair Restraints And Clean Apparel WornInspector note: FOOD HANDLERS NOT WEARING HAIR RESTRAINTS. INSTD TO DO SO.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Pass on August 12, 2015: 3 findings appeared for the first time. 2 findings recurred. 1 previous finding did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Near West Side
About this record
This record comes from Chicago Department of Public Health. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Chicago Data Portal.