✕

75 On Liberty Wharf

February 24, 2016 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeEating & Drinking
failed findings1
critical findings1

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

Consumer Advisoriescritical

Inspector note: Provide proper consumer sdvisory on menu where needed
code M-3-603.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail

Checks marked passed

Person in charge Assignedcritical

Inspector note: No designated PIC in charge with proper knowledge of food safety
code M-2-101.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Pass
PIC Knowledgecritical

Inspector note: No allergen awareness certificatin - provide
code M-2-102.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Pass
Shellstock ID

Inspector note: Missing tags - keep on site as discussed
code 01-3-202.18** · serious findingstatus: Pass
Food Contact Surfaces Design

Inspector note: Replace badly worn cutting board on the cooking line
code 14-4-202.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass
Test Kit Provided

Inspector note: No test kits provide
code 17-4-302.14* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass
Non-Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: Clean inside / outside of all refrigeration units from all visible soils
code 23-4-602.13* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass
Hand Cleaner Drying Tissue Signage

Inspector note: Replace missing paper towels by the hand sink on the cooking line
code 32-6-301.11-02.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass
Soiled Linen Storage

Inspector note: Soiled rags and aprons discarded on the floor - stora as discussed
code 44-4-802/03.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Fail on February 17, 2016: 1 finding recurred. 8 previous findings did not recur.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in South Boston Waterfront

See every restaurant in South Boston Waterfront →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.