✓
Corporate Chefs @ Tufts Food 4 Thot
September 12, 2013 · Pass
😇clean
- official resultPass
- resultPass
- inspection typeEating & Drinking
- failed findings0
- critical findings0
✓ No failed findings were recorded; 2 code checks were marked passed.
Checks marked passed
-
Dishwashng FacilitiesInspector note: The three-bay sink and hand sink basins to the Food 4 Thought food preparation kitchen are pitted. Whereas the establishment utilizes a quaternary ammonia sanitizer and nothing but hand soap is discarded to the hand sink it appears that the pitting is the result of a phyical defect. The pitting in the three-bay sink is severe enough that water is leaking through the pits into plastic trays set below the sink. The basins should be repaired or replaced to eliminate the leaking and provide an internal surface that is readily cleanable and does not represent a point of harborage for bacteria and other soil.
-
premises not properly maintained or cleanedOfficial wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/CeilingsInspector note: The walls within the food preparation area of the Food 4 Thought preparation kitchen are pitted. The pitting appears to be the result of the daily use and storage of pots pans and other utensils. A close inspection of the equipment in these areas revealed a trace transfer of gypsum paint and cellulose covering to the equipment. The gypsum is exposed in several of the wall pits. Whereas the gypsum and unpainted surfaces are not cleanable and are absorbent the wall surfaces within the food preparation area (three-basin sink and equipment storage areas) should be resurfaced. A more durable surface FRP for instance would potentially eliminate the need for annual expenditures on wall surface repair.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on August 8, 2013: 2 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Chinatown
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.