✕
Corporate Chefs @ Tufts Food 4 Thot
August 6, 2014 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeEating & Drinking
- failed findings11
- critical findings7
Failed findings
-
Labeling of IngredientscriticalInspector note: Prepacked foods for customer self service not labeled with list of ingredients and address of source
-
Hot HoldingcriticalInspector note: Chicken 98 F
-
Cold HoldingcriticalInspector note: Chicken 47 F 51 F
-
Personnel w/ Infections Restricted/ExcludedcriticalInspector note: PIC could not state employee illness policy that reflect the food code.
-
Adequate Handwashing/Where/When/HowcriticalInspector note: Multitasking wearing gloves. Employees not washing hand prior to putting on new gloves.
-
Separation/Sanitizer CriteriacriticalInspector note: Chlorine 200 PPM at 3 bay sink (must maintain 50-100 PPM) • Hand soap dispenser stored above food prep sink.
-
PIC Performing DutiescriticalInspector note: All food handlers must be properly trained in food safety and sanitation as it relates to their assigned duties by the certified food protection manager per code.
-
Food Container LabelsInspector note: Food containers not labeled.
-
Food ProtectionInspector note: Post signage reminding customers to use utensils/deli tissue at self service areas. • Provide food grade containers with tight fitting lids for all food storage.Food containers must be food grade quality.
-
Non-Food Contact SurfacesInspector note: Discontinue using soda crates for storage and provide approved shelving 6" above the floor.
-
Wiping Cloths Clean SanitizeInspector note: Using sponges - Discontinue and provide proper wiping cloths in a sanitizing solution per code.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on May 8, 2014: 8 findings appeared for the first time. 3 findings recurred. 8 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Chinatown
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.