J.P. Licks At W.R. Inc.

• official resultFail
• resultFail
• inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
• failed findings7
• critical findings2

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

• ⚠️Pesticide Usagecritical
  Inspector note: There are cans of raid in the bathroom. Make sure that all pesticide application is done by a licensed exterminator.
  code 41-7-206.12/.13*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
• ⚠️PIC Knowledgecritical
  Inspector note: The manager does not have his alleren awareness certificate posted. Post the certificate.
  code M-2-102.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
• ⚠️Non-Food Contact Surfaces Clean
  Inspector note: There are food spills and debris on the counters and refrigeration. Clean the area to remove spills.
  code 23-4-602.13* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
• ⚠️Clean Equipment & Utensils Storage
  Inspector note: There is a lot of in use equipment stored next to the handsinks. Keep the handsinks clear so employees have no trouble washing their hands and the equipment doesn't get splashed with dirty water.
  code 24-4-903.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
• ⚠️Single Service Articles Stored Dispensed
  Inspector note: The taster spoons and the forks are stored in varying directions. Store utensils properly.
  code 25-4-904.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
• ⚠️Rooms and Equipment Vented
  Inspector note: The bathroom vent is not working. Repair or replace bathroom vent.
  code 39-6-304.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
• ⚠️Premises Maintained
  Inspector note: The bathroom is overcrowded and messy. Remove all unecessary items and keep the bathroom clean.
  code 42-6-501.113/.114* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Pass on May 13, 2010: 7 findings appeared for the first time.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.