✕

Starbucks Coffee No. 883

August 14, 2012 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
failed findings9
critical findings2

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

PIC Performing Dutiescritical

Inspector note: Post allergen awareness poster in employee areas.
code M-2-103.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Non-Compliance w/Employee Health Policycritical

code M-2-201.11/.14 .15*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Insects Rodents Animals

Inspector note: Evidence of mice droppings. Provide full exterminationprior to reinspection .
code 35-6-501.111/.115** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Clean Cloths Hair Restraint

Inspector note: Food handlers not wearing hair restraints.
code 13-2-304/402.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Wiping Cloths Clean Sanitize

Inspector note: Wiping cloths not properly stored in a sanitizing solution
code 21-3-304.14* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Hand Cleaner Drying Tissue Signage

Inspector note: Bathroom door not self closing.
code 32-6-301.11-02.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Adequate Number Frequency Vermin Proof

Inspector note: Provide covers for waste receptacles.
code 33-5-501.13-.17* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Improper Maintenance of Floors

Inspector note: Clean floor under and behind all equipment.
code 36-6-501.11-.12* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
premises not properly maintained or cleaned

Official wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/Ceilings
Inspector note: Rust on ceiling and walls in Employee Bathroom • Stained and missing ceiling tiles
code 37-6-501.11-.12* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Pass on January 18, 2012: 9 findings appeared for the first time.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Downtown

See every restaurant in Downtown →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.