?
Supreme Market
September 1, 2022 · Administrative record filed
🫥not rated
- official resultAdministrative record filed
- inspection typeRetail Food
- failed findings1
- critical findings0
📁 This is an administrative record, not a health inspection. It does not replace the restaurant's latest meaningful health result.
Failed findings
-
(B) and (C) Equipment Food-Contact Surfaces Nonfood-Contact Surfaces and Utensils (C)Inspector note: Older trauslen multi door refrigeration unit although maintaining a proper internal temperature of 40F the inside has several compromised and rusted areas - several small leaks / condensation inside as well - only 10% of the interior is in use at this time - surfaces shall be [ clean - smooth - durable - non absorbant ] repair / replace or reemove as discussed during inspection
Checks marked passed
-
(A)-(P) Person-In-Charge-Duties (Pf)Inspector note: Repeat violation on having a cat on premise - extremely obnoxious odorous coming from an adjacent room connected to the retail section of the store - addressed immediately and removed - no rodernt issues at this time however moving forward the business shall provide a professionally licensed pest control company if rodent issues are present
-
Package Integrity (Pf)Inspector note: Multi individual sleeves of [ Ritx crackers - without any information pertaining to ingredients or allergen labels on each package ] are being sold out for retail sale - store has a retail license which means that when selling foods out for self service at the retail leval each item shall have an available label properly describing the contents of the product and its ingredients - discontinue selling any foods out for retail sale that nare not properly packaged and properly labeled as discussed during inspection
-
Prohibiting Animals (Pf)Inspector note: Remove cat as well as the odorous litter box kept in an exposed adjacent room inside the store
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on August 25, 2022: 1 finding recurred. 3 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Roxbury
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.