✕
Austin Food Mart
August 19, 2013 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeComplaint
- failed findings6
- critical findings0
Failed findings
-
toxic items stored near foodOfficial wording: No Evidence Of Rodent Or Insect Outer Openings Protected/Rodent Proofed, A Written Log Shall Be Maintained Available To The InspectorsInspector note: THE FRONT DOOR NOT TIGHT FITTING OR RODENT PROOFED HAS A HALF INCH GAP AT THE BOTTOM OF THE DOOR. SERIOUS CITATION GIVEN 7-38-020
-
hot/cold holding temps offOfficial wording: * Certified Food Manager On Site When Potentially Hazardous Foods Are Prepared And ServedInspector note: NO CERTIFIED FOOD MANAGER WITH A CITY OF CHICAGO FOOD SANITATION CERTIFICATE ON SITE WHEN POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS FOODS ARE PREP AND SERVED. BEEF 40.1F AND TURKEY BREAST 39.6F. SERIOUS CITATION GIVEN 7-38-012.
-
food prep surfaces dirtyOfficial wording: Food And Non-Food Contact Equipment Utensils Clean, Free Of Abrasive DetergentsInspector note: CLEAN THE FOOD STORAGE SHELVES IN THE WALKIN COOLER HAS SOME SPLASHED ON FOOD DEBEIS ON THEM.
-
Floors: Constructed Per Code, Cleaned, Good Repair, Coving Installed, Dust-Less Cleaning Methods UsedInspector note: LIFT THE FOOD STORAGE SHELVES IN THE STORE AND CLEAN UNDERNEATH.
-
Walls, Ceilings, Attached Equipment Constructed Per Code: Good Repair, Surfaces Clean And Dust-Less Cleaning MethodsInspector note: MUST REPLACE THE WATER STAINED CEILING TILES IN THE REAR STOREROOM.
-
thermometers missingOfficial wording: Lighting: Required Minimum Foot-Candles Of Light Provided, Fixtures ShieldedInspector note: REPAIR OR REPLACE THE THE MIDDLE LIGHT FIXTURE IN THE WALKIN COOLER.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Pass on February 7, 2013: 6 findings appeared for the first time. 2 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Austin
About this record
This record comes from Chicago Department of Public Health. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Chicago Data Portal.