✓!

Chef Daddy

October 28, 2016 · Pass w/ Conditions

😬mid

official resultPass w/ Conditions
resultPass w/ Conditions
inspection typeCanvass
failed findings5
critical findings1

Failed findings

sick-employee policy not followedcritical

Official wording: Potentially Hazardous Food Meets Temperature Requirement During Storage, Preparation Display And Service
Inspector note: OBSERVED IMPROPER TEMPERATURE OF POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS FOODS AT THE HOT HOLDING UNIT,RIBS,122.9F,TOTAL WEIGHT 1LB,TOTAL COST $10.00,PORK STEAK,110.9F,TOTAL WEIGHT 2LBS,TOTAL COST $15.00,RIB TIPS,120.7F,TOTAL WEIGHT 2LBS,TOTAL COST $20.00,FOOD ITEMS WERE DENATURED AND DESTROYED DURING INSPECTION,CRITICAL VIOLATION 7-38-005(A)
code 3Priority
Food In Original Container, Properly Labeled: Customer Advisory Posted As Needed

Inspector note: MUST LABEL BULK FOOD CONTAINERS IN REAR OF PREMISES
code 30
Food And Non-Food Contact Surfaces Properly Designed, Constructed And Maintained

Inspector note: MUST REPAIR THE RUBBER GASKETS AT THE 2 DOOR REACH-IN COOLER IN REAR OF PREMISES,INSTRUCTED TO REPAIR
code 32
Walls, Ceilings, Attached Equipment Constructed Per Code: Good Repair, Surfaces Clean And Dust-Less Cleaning Methods

Inspector note: MUST REPLACE COVING ON WALL NEAR THE STOVE AND 3 COMPARTMENT SINK IN PREP AREA,INSTRUCTED TO PROVIDE
code 35
grimy wiping cloths

Official wording: Premises Maintained Free Of Litter, Unnecessary Articles, Cleaning Equipment Properly Stored
Inspector note: MUST REMOVE CLUTTER IN REAR OF PREMISES IN THE STORAGE AREA,INSTRUCTED TO REMOVE TO PREVENT RODENT HARBORAGE
code 41

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Pass w/ Conditions on February 9, 2016: 3 findings appeared for the first time. 2 findings recurred. 5 previous findings did not recur.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Austin

See every restaurant in Austin →

About this record

This record comes from Chicago Department of Public Health. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Chicago Data Portal.