✕

Harold's Chicken Shack

October 7, 2016 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeLicense Re-Inspection
failed findings5
critical findings1

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

certified manager paperwork missingcritical

Official wording: Facilities To Maintain Proper Temperature
Inspector note: PREMISES MUST PROVIDE ADEQUATE REFRIGERATION. NO REFRIGERATION UNITS PROVIDED. CRITICAL VIOLATION 7-38-005(A).
code 2Priority
toxic items stored near food

Official wording: No Evidence Of Rodent Or Insect Outer Openings Protected/Rodent Proofed, A Written Log Shall Be Maintained Available To The Inspectors
Inspector note: PREMISES MUST PROVIDE PROOF OF HAVING A LICENSE PEST CONTROL SERVICE AND A COMPLETE PEST CONTROL LOG BOOK. SERIOUS VIOLATION 7-38-020. NO CITATION ISSUED. AT THIS TIME OF INSPECTION NOTED 15 MICE DROPPINGS ON BOTTOM SHELF OF FRONT SERVICE COUNTER AND 20 MICE DROPPINGS ON CINDER BLOCK IN UTILITY CLOSET. MUST REMOVE CLEAN/SANITIZE AFFECTED AREAS. PREMISES NOT OPEN/OPERATING AT THIS TIME.
code 18
Outside Garbage Waste Grease And Storage Area; Clean, Rodent Proof, All Containers Covered

Inspector note: MUST PROVIDE PROOF OF CONTRACT WITH A LICENSE DISPOSAL SERVICE AND A DUMPSTER. SERIOUS VIOLATION 7-38-020. NO CITATION ISSUED.
code 19
Walls, Ceilings, Attached Equipment Constructed Per Code: Good Repair, Surfaces Clean And Dust-Less Cleaning Methods

Inspector note: REPAIR/REPLACE ALL WATER DAMAGED CEILING TILES WHERE NECESSARY.
code 35
grimy wiping cloths

Official wording: Premises Maintained Free Of Litter, Unnecessary Articles, Cleaning Equipment Properly Stored
Inspector note: VIOLATION CORRECTED.
code 41

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Fail on September 20, 2016: 5 findings recurred.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Greater Grand Crossing

See every restaurant in Greater Grand Crossing →

About this record

This record comes from Chicago Department of Public Health. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Chicago Data Portal.