✕
Hotel Burnham / Atwood Cafe
July 14, 2016 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeCanvass Re-Inspection
- failed findings4
- critical findings1
Failed findings
-
Previous Serious Violation Corrected, 7-42-090criticalInspector note: Previous serious violation from inspection report# 1781257 dated 7/7/2016:( Found observed front, side entrance doors not rodent proofed doors had gaps on bottom of doors, middle of doors, ranging from 1/2 inch, to 1 inch or grater at time of inspection. Citation issued 7-42-090) Critical violation).
-
Food And Non-Food Contact Surfaces Properly Designed, Constructed And MaintainedInspector note: Above violation still remaining(: Walk in cooler shelving/racks that had peeling paint/rust, shall be repaired/replaced. Reach in cooler shelving/racks that had rust/peeling paint, shall be repaired/replaced. Cutting boards that had deep cuts, shall be replaced). .
-
Floors: Constructed Per Code, Cleaned, Good Repair, Coving Installed, Dust-Less Cleaning Methods UsedInspector note: Above violation still remaining( Floors in bsmt storage area by pop dispensing unit that had broken floor tiles, shall be repaired/replaced. Floors in walk in cooler had peeling paint/exposed concrete, shall be repaired/sealed).
-
Walls, Ceilings, Attached Equipment Constructed Per Code: Good Repair, Surfaces Clean And Dust-Less Cleaning MethodsInspector note: Above violation still remaining(Wall that had exposed raw wood, exposed cinder blocks in rear kitchen storage area in bsmt, shall ne repaired/sealed. Walls/ ceilings in kitchen storage room, must be smooth, easily cleanable per code).
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on July 7, 2016: 1 finding appeared for the first time. 3 findings recurred. 9 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Loop
About this record
This record comes from Chicago Department of Public Health. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Chicago Data Portal.