✕
Jimmy John's
April 25, 2016 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeCanvass
- failed findings5
- critical findings0
Failed findings
-
toxic items stored near foodOfficial wording: No Evidence Of Rodent Or Insect Outer Openings Protected/Rodent Proofed, A Written Log Shall Be Maintained Available To The InspectorsInspector note: Found/observed front entrance/exit doors not rodent proofed, doors had gaps of 1/4, to 1/2 inch on bottom, middle of doors, also observed rear kitchen exit door not rodent proofed had 1/2 inch on bottom of door Citation issued 7-38-020, Serious violation.
-
Food And Non-Food Contact Surfaces Properly Designed, Constructed And MaintainedInspector note: Cooler shelving/racks that had peeling paint/rust, shall be repaired/replaced. Caulk around exposed hand sink, and 3 compartment sink in prep area, in state of disrepair, shall be repaired/replaced.
-
food prep surfaces dirtyOfficial wording: Food And Non-Food Contact Equipment Utensils Clean, Free Of Abrasive DetergentsInspector note: Cooler shelving/racks not clean, need detailed cleaning(crevices). Prep table lower shelving not clean, need detailed cleaning(crevices),
-
Floors: Constructed Per Code, Cleaned, Good Repair, Coving Installed, Dust-Less Cleaning Methods UsedInspector note: Floors under heavy equipment, rear storage shelving not clean, need detailed cleaning(corners), floors in prep area by 3 compartment sink area, and by exposed hand sink, need re-grouting.
-
grimy wiping clothsOfficial wording: Premises Maintained Free Of Litter, Unnecessary Articles, Cleaning Equipment Properly StoredInspector note: Stock items must be stored six inches off of floor to prevent pest harborage.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Pass on January 13, 2015: 4 findings appeared for the first time. 1 finding recurred.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Loop
About this record
This record comes from Chicago Department of Public Health. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Chicago Data Portal.