✕
Panera Bread
June 18, 2014 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeCanvass Re-Inspection
- failed findings4
- critical findings0
Failed findings
-
toxic items stored near foodOfficial wording: No Evidence Of Rodent Or Insect Outer Openings Protected/Rodent Proofed, A Written Log Shall Be Maintained Available To The InspectorsInspector note: FOUND FRONT TWO DOORS NOT RODENT/INSECTS PROOFED. ONE DOOR WITH APPROXIMATELY 1/2 AN INCH GAP ON THE BOTTOM OF THE DOOR AND THE OTHER DOOR WITH 1/4 OF INCH GAP IN BETWEEN THE MIDDLE BOTTOM OF THE DOOR AND GAP ON THE LEFT BOTTOM CORNER OF THE DOOR. INSTRUCTED TO RODENT/INSECTS PROOFED THE DOOR. CITATION ISSUED SERIOUS 7-38-020.
-
Food And Non-Food Contact Surfaces Properly Designed, Constructed And MaintainedInspector note: MUST RE CAULK ALONG THE WALLS OF THE DISH MACHINE AND ONE OF THE WASHBOWL SINK INSIDE THE WOMENS WASHROOM AND MAINTAIN. MUST INSTALL A HOOK ON THE SPRAYER OF THE TWO COMPARTMENT SINK(MISSING HOOK ON THE SPRAYER).
-
Walls, Ceilings, Attached Equipment Constructed Per Code: Good Repair, Surfaces Clean And Dust-Less Cleaning MethodsInspector note: MUST CLEAN THE FAN GUARD INSIDE THE WALK IN COOLER WITH DUST ACCUMULATED AND MAINTAIN.
-
pests in the houseOfficial wording: Ventilation: Rooms And Equipment Vented As Required: Plumbing: Installed And MaintainedInspector note: LEAK ON THE FAUCET CONNECTOR OF THE TWO COMPARTMENT SINK AND THE ONE COMPARTMENT SINK IN THE COFFEE STATION IN THE REAR AREA. MUST REPAIR TO STOP THE LEAK. MUST INSTALL BACK FLOW PREVENTER DEVICE ON THE COFFEE MACHINE IN THE REAR AREA . ONE OF THE WASHBOWL SINK IN MENS WASHROOM SLOW DRAINING. MUST REPAIR TO HAVE A WELL DRAINING SINK.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on June 17, 2014: 4 findings recurred. 2 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Lincoln Park
About this record
This record comes from Chicago Department of Public Health. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Chicago Data Portal.