Rosas Tamales #2

January 19, 2011 · Fail
🪳cooked
  • official resultFail
  • resultFail
  • inspection typeLicense
  • failed findings4
  • critical findings1

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

  • food from a questionable sourcecritical
    Official wording: Adequate Number, Convenient, Accessible, Designed, And Maintained
    Inspector note: EXPOSED HANDSINK MISSING IN REAR PREP AREA. PROVIDE SAME.
    code 11Priority
  • toxic items stored near food
    Official wording: No Evidence Of Rodent Or Insect Outer Openings Protected/Rodent Proofed, A Written Log Shall Be Maintained Available To The Inspectors
    Inspector note: DOORS NOT RODENT PROOF. INSTD TO RODENT PROOF SAME SO AS TO BE TIGHT FITTING AND NO DAYLIGHT TO BE SEEN.
    code 18
  • Dish Washing Facilities: Properly Designed, Constructed, Maintained, Installed, Located And Operated
    Inspector note: 3-COMPARTMENT SINK FAUCET IMPROPERLY DESIGNED. INSTD TO PROVIDE FAUCET THAT EXTENDS TO EACH COMPARTMENT.
    code 24
  • Walls, Ceilings, Attached Equipment Constructed Per Code: Good Repair, Surfaces Clean And Dust-Less Cleaning Methods
    Inspector note: WALL IN BASEMENT IN POOR REPAIR. REPAIR SAME.
    code 35

Browse this restaurant's inspections

About this record

This record comes from Chicago Department of Public Health. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Chicago Data Portal.

official city health-inspection data · no account, no sign-up