?

Cafe Lava & Bento

July 16, 2025 · Administrative record filed

🫥not rated

official resultAdministrative record filed
inspection typeEating & Drinking
failed findings1
critical findings0

📁 This is an administrative record, not a health inspection. It does not replace the restaurant's latest meaningful health result.

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

System Maintained in Good Repair (C)

Inspector note: Leak under dump sink at service line. Repair as needed.
code 590.005/5-205.15-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

Checks marked passed

Before Use After Cleaning (P)critical

Inspector note: Equipment and pans observed washed but not sanitized. Review 3 compartment sink washing and sanitizing procedures with staff to prevent contamination.
code 590.004/4-702.11-P*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Pass
Sanitizing Solutions Testing Devices (Pf)

Inspector note: No test strips for chemical sanitizer. Provide test strips for either quats or chlorine sanitizer.
code 590.004/4-302.14-PF** · serious findingstatus: Pass
Using a Handwashing Sink-Operation and Maintenance (Pf)

Inspector note: Hand sink at sandwich station blocked by refrigerator. Keeo hand sinks clear and available at all times. Corrected on site.
code 590.005/5-205.11-PF** · serious findingstatus: Pass
Effectiveness-Hair Restraints (C)

Inspector note: Food handler without hair restraint. Provide hat or hairnets.
code 590.002/2-402.11-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass
Nonfood Contact Surfaces (C)

Inspector note: Soils under dump sink in cabinet. Clean and maintain.
code 590.004/4-602.13-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Fail on July 9, 2025: 1 finding appeared for the first time. 5 previous findings did not recur.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Brighton

See every restaurant in Brighton →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.