✕

China King Restaurant

February 2, 2016 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeEating & Drinking
failed findings7
critical findings3

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

Separation Segregation Cross Contaminationcritical

Inspector note: raw beef stored over cooked noodles store raw foods below ready to eat foods
code 08-3-302.11/3-304.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Location Accessiblecritical

Inspector note: hand sink blocked by rolling cart remove to allow access to proeprly wash hands
code 31-5-204/05.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Pesticide Usagecritical

Inspector note: can of roach spray found under hand sink remove and discontinue use
code 41-7-206.12/.13*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Insects Rodents Animals

Inspector note: evidence or live roaches seen under 2 door cold unit clean to remove and supply exterminator IPM reports with findings and recommendations
code 35-6-501.111/.115** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Non-Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: bottom shelf of coke cold unit with soils clean to remove
code 23-4-602.13* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Improper Maintenance of Floors

Inspector note: 1. floors under 3 bay sink with debris and old soils clean to remove 2. floors under cooking line with pooling water debris and grease build up clean to remove
code 36-6-501.11-.12* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
premises not properly maintained or cleaned

Official wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/Ceilings
Inspector note: hood with grease build up clean to remove
code 37-6-501.11-.12* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Pass on October 9, 2015: 7 findings appeared for the first time.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Leather District

See every restaurant in Leather District →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.