?
Dot 2 Dot Cafe
August 15, 2014 · Administrative record filed
🫥not rated
- official resultAdministrative record filed
- inspection typeEating & Drinking
- failed findings1
- critical findings0
📁 This is an administrative record, not a health inspection. It does not replace the restaurant's latest meaningful health result.
Failed findings
-
Installed and MaintainedInspector note: Pipe under the single bay sink in the main kitchen leaking. Repair.
Checks marked passed
-
Labeling of IngredientscriticalInspector note: No Food Allergen warning signs on to go menus. Provide the proper Food Allergen verbage on all to go menus.
-
Location AccessiblecriticalInspector note: Hand sink in dish room observed being blocked by a clean dish rack. Discontinue and ensure all hand sinks are accessible.
-
Insects Rodents AnimalsInspector note: Evidence of fruit fly activity in the basement storage area. Address and provide an up to date pest control report for the re-inspection.
-
Food Thermometers ProvidedInspector note: No food thermometers available at the time of the inspection. Provide.
-
Food Contact Surfaces DesignInspector note: Sponges observed at the 3 bay sink. Discontibue use.
-
Non-Food Contact Surfaces CleanInspector note: Interior of the Turbo Fan Oven with excess carbon build-up. Clean interior and door.
-
Hand Cleaner Drying Tissue SignageInspector note: No signage at hand sink in dish room. Provide.
-
premises not properly maintained or cleanedOfficial wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/CeilingsInspector note: Hood and vetilation tags with a past expiration date of July 2014. Provide up to date Hood and Ventilation Tags for the re-inspection. Referral being made to the City of Boston Fire Department.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on August 8, 2014: 1 finding recurred. 8 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Dorchester
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.