Dumpling Cafe Inc.

September 12, 2024 · Temporary permit action

🫥not rated

official resultTemporary permit action
inspection typeEating & Drinking
failed findings14
critical findings2

📁 This is an administrative record, not a health inspection. It does not replace the restaurant's latest meaningful health result.

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

(A)(1) Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food Hot and Cold Holding (P)critical

Inspector note: Fried chicken observed next to fryolater at 65F in ambient air. Product discarded. Hold hot food at 135F or above.
code 590.003/3-501.16-P1*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
uspension of Permit / Emergency Closure without a Prior Hearing (P)critical

Inspector note: Imminent hazard noted with infestation of pests and rodents. Droppings in multiple locations and dead roaches on equiptment.
code 590.014/SummaryS-P*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
(A) Equipment Food-Contact Surfaces Nonfood-Contact Surfaces and Utensils (Pf)

Inspector note: Slicer in basement encrusted with food debris. Wire shelfing in walk in cooler is encrusted with food debris and rust build up. Clean all soils. Replace damaged shelfing.
code 590.004/4-601.11-PF** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Controlling Pests (Pf)

Inspector note: Rodent droppings observed under cook line equiptment in back alley way in basement floor on sheet tray on speed rack in basement. Dead roaches observed on equiptment in basement. Pest report provided from 9.5.24. Clean and sanitize all areas. Increase pest control as needed.
code 590.006/6-501.111-PF** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Eating Drinking or Using Tobacco (C)

Inspector note: Cigarette package observed in close proximity to food. Corrected on site.
code 590.002/2-401.11-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Effectiveness-Hair Restraints (C)

Inspector note: Multiple employees on cookline without hair restraints. Corrected on site.
code 590.002/2-402.11-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Miscellaneous Sources of Contamination (C)

Inspector note: Mop sink is not enclosed. Provide barrier to prevent potential contamination.
code 590.003/3-307.11-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Nonfood-Contact Surfaces (C)

Inspector note: Cardboard lined on cookline. Remove. Surfaces must be easily cleanable.
code 590.004/4-101.19-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Equipment Clothes Washers Dryers and Storage Cabinets Contamination Prevention Location (C)

Inspector note: Mops observed stored in alley way. Discontinue.
code 590.004/4-401.11-C1* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
(B) and (C) Equipment Food-Contact Surfaces Nonfood-Contact Surfaces and Utensils (C)

Inspector note: Basement prep area is soiled with food debris. Clean to remove all soils.
code 590.004/4-601.11-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Nonfood Contact Surfaces (C)

Inspector note: Floors under beverage refrigerator have food debris. Under cookline equiptment is soiled. Behind fryolater is soiled. Grease build up around filters on cookline. Clean to remove all soils.
code 590.004/4-602.13-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
System Maintained in Good Repair (C)

Inspector note: Two bay sink in basement observed leaking. Repair as necessary.
code 590.005/5-205.15-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Outer Openings Protected (C)

Inspector note: Back door observed open during inspection. Close to prevent potential pests.
code 590.006/6-202.15-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Maintaining Premises Unnecessary Items and Litter (C)

Inspector note: Soiled woks and excess items stored in alley way. Remove all excess items and trash.
code 590.006/6-501.114-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Pass on August 29, 2024: 14 findings appeared for the first time.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Chinatown

See every restaurant in Chinatown →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.