?
Dunkin Donuts
January 8, 2024 · Administrative hearing
🫥not rated
- official resultAdministrative hearing
- inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
- failed findings2
- critical findings0
📁 This is an administrative record, not a health inspection. It does not replace the restaurant's latest meaningful health result.
Failed findings
-
Controlling Pests (C)Inspector note: Evidence of rodent activity in the back room near the back entrance and near the dry storage under the little table. Clean floor to remove droppings. 1/08/24- PIC WAS PRESENT DURING THE INSPECTION. The pest control company ECOLAB stated on the last invoice that they needed to seal some holes to prevent the pest from entering the building. The PIC took action and applied spray foam inside the holes. This was observed during today's inspection. Observed rodent droppings old and new in the hallway leading to the front. CLEAN AND SWEEP- the floors under all the shelving in and around the office under the small table. Remove water in the back hallway leading out to the back door. ECOLAB-stated on the invoice that they would be out JAN 3rd. No one came out. Provide a updated pest report.
-
flagged at inspectionInspector note: Non payment for 2024 Health Permit.
Checks marked passed
-
Cleaning Ventilation Systems Nuisance and Discharge Prohibition (C)Inspector note: 2 Hood vents stickers expired on 11/2022. Contact licensed person to come out and inspect the hoods. 1/8/24- PIC called the owner (Mike) and he sent over the hood sticker invoice. Apparently the company (Hood Master) forgot to replace the hood sticker. Replace sticker with the updated sticker. This sticker states 12/30/23
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on January 4, 2024: 1 finding appeared for the first time. 1 finding recurred. 1 previous finding did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Mattapan
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.