✕

Flames Restaurant

October 26, 2009 · Fail

😬mid

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
failed findings9
critical findings0

Failed findings

Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: Grease soiled replace.
code 22-4-601/602.11** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Food Thermometers Provided

Inspector note: Provide chefs thermometer for monitoring temperatures.
code 05-4-302.12* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Food Protection

Inspector note: Stored Sugar no cover provide.
code 08-3-305-307.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Food Contact Surfaces Design

Inspector note: Provide additional food service containers with covers. • Replace heavily grooved cutting board.
code 14-4-202.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Test Kit Provided

Inspector note: Providd test kit for bleach sanitizer.
code 17-4-302.14* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Non-Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: Light sheild covers soiled clean. • storage table at rear soiled clean.
code 23-4-602.13* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Clean Equipment & Utensils Storage

Inspector note: Soiled equipment stored on floor elevate.
code 24-4-903.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Improper Maintenance of Floors

Inspector note: Replace missing tiles.
code 36-6-501.11-.12* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
premises not properly maintained or cleaned

Official wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/Ceilings
Inspector note: Repair restroom door loose. • Rodent proof bottom of exit door.
code 37-6-501.11-.12* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Fail on May 28, 2009: 3 findings appeared for the first time. 6 findings recurred. 10 previous findings did not recur.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Mattapan

See every restaurant in Mattapan →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.