✕
Franklin Cafe
October 1, 2025 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeEating & Drinking
- failed findings2
- critical findings1
Failed findings
-
Backflow Prevention (P)criticalInspector note: The drain pipe for the basement prep sink does not have an indirect to waste drain pipe. Install.
-
Service Sink (C)Inspector note: No mop sink. Install.
Checks marked passed
-
(A) Gloves Use Limitation (P)criticalInspector note: Food employee handled raw pork then returned to work on other items and touch pan handle. Instructed to change gloves wash hands don new gloves sanitize pan. Corrected on site .
-
Cooling (P)criticalInspector note: Deep pan of mashed potatoes on counter @ 114F. Made within the hour moved onto indirect ice bath to cool. Cooling process shall start when food reaches to 135F after cooking.
-
(A)(2) and (B) Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food Hot and Cold Holding (P)criticalInspector note: Chive oil 63F. Product out of temperature for less than one hour placed on ice to cool.
-
Clean-up of Vomiting and Diarrheal Events (Pf)Inspector note: No V&D kit provide. emailed procedures
-
Shell stock Maintaining Identification (Pf)Inspector note: Date of last sold not recorded on tags in shellstock tag file. Corrected on site.
-
In-Use Utensils Between-Use Storage (C)Inspector note: Utensils at the cookline (ladles ect) stored in standing water. Maintain water above 135F
-
Nonfood Contact Surfaces (C)Inspector note: Stair leading to basement with visible soils. Clean to remove.
-
Anti-ChokingInspector note: No choke save certificate. Provide. (A) Anti-choking Procedures in Food Service Establishments. (1) Pursuant to M.G.L. c. 94 § 305D restaurants with a certain seating capacity are required to have one or more employees trained in a manual choke-saving procedure in accordance with 105 CMR 605.000: Approved Choke-saving Procedures. (2) Each food service establishment with a seating capacity that conforms with M.G.L. c. 94 § 305D shall: (a) Have on its premises while food is being served an employee trained in manual procedures approved by the Department to remove food lodged in a person's throat; and (b) Make adequate provision for insurance to cover employees trained in rendering such assistance.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on September 24, 2025: 2 findings recurred. 8 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in South End
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.