Haru

• official resultFail
• resultFail
• inspection typeEating & Drinking
• failed findings2
• critical findings0

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

• ⚠️Non-Food Contact Surfaces
  Inspector note: hot line/repair 3 door undercounter
  code 15-4-202.16* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
• ⚠️Equipment Thermometers
  Inspector note: high temp/repair gauges
  code 17-4-204.112/.115* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

Checks marked passed

• ✓Conformance w/ Approved Procedurescritical
  Inspector note: provide up to date lab reports/recipe and employee sign off
  code M-8-103.12*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Pass
• ✓Food Contact Surfaces Clean
  Inspector note: ice machine/clean/sanitize interior white panel
  code 22-4-601/602.11** · serious findingstatus: Pass
• ✓Food Contact Surfaces Design
  Inspector note: resurface all worn white cutting boards
  code 14-4-202.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass
• ✓Wiping Cloths Clean Sanitize
  Inspector note: remove all sponges
  code 21-3-304.14* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass
• ✓Toilet Enclosed Clean
  Inspector note: employee restroom/replace damaged toilet seat
  code 32-6-501.11-.12/6-202.14* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass
• ✓premises not properly maintained or cleaned
  Official wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/Ceilings
  Inspector note: employee locker area/repair damaged covering to pipes employee restrooms/clean vents provide up to date licensed hood cleaning sticker
  code 37-6-501.11-.12* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass
• ✓Premises Maintained
  Inspector note: employee restrooms/clean/organize employee locker area/clean/organize
  code 42-6-501.113/.114* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Fail on August 13, 2015: 2 findings recurred. 7 previous findings did not recur.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.