?
Joe V's
June 3, 2009 · Temporary permit action
🫥not rated
- official resultTemporary permit action
- inspection typeEating & Drinking
- failed findings10
- critical findings1
📁 This is an administrative record, not a health inspection. It does not replace the restaurant's latest meaningful health result.
Failed findings
-
Food Contact Surfaces CleancriticalInspector note: no Sanitizer in the Lo temp Dishwasher
-
Food Contact Surfaces CleanInspector note: clean and sanitize all food contact services
-
Food ProtectionInspector note: cartons are on the floor restricting movement and the fire exit door is blocked.
-
Wiping Cloths Clean SanitizeInspector note: Wiping cloths not being kept in sanitizer as required.
-
Non-Food Contact Surfaces CleanInspector note: clean and sanitize all non food contact Surfaces.
-
Improper Storage of Re-usable UtensilsInspector note: Silverware not stored with handles up.
-
Installed and MaintainedInspector note: Pipes leaking on the foodprep sink. the water is odorous and leaking through the floor into the basement. This leak needs to be repaired.
-
premises not properly maintained or cleanedOfficial wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/CeilingsInspector note: Shelving hanging from ceiling-grease coated with dust balls hanging over food prep area
-
Inadequate LightingInspector note: Employees working with only one out of six working
-
Proper storage of clean linenInspector note: the clean linens in the basement now must be considered dirty and may not be used
Checks marked passed
-
Separation Segregation Cross Contaminationcritical
-
Equipment Thermometers
-
Walls/Ceilings Designed Constructed Installed
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on April 23, 2008: 10 findings appeared for the first time. 3 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in South End
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.