✕

King's/The 88 Club

July 24, 2008 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeEating & Drinking
failed findings7
critical findings2

Failed findings

Cold Holdingcritical

Inspector note: Ground pork in Walk-in refridge at 48F.Swiss cheese in Walk-in at 50F.
code 03-3-501.16(A)*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Separation/Sanitizer Criteriacritical

Inspector note: Sanitizer at 3bay at 400ppm.
code 41-7-201/04.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Insects Rodents Animals

Inspector note: Evidence of fruit flies throughout establishment.Provide proper IPM reports detealing level of activity sanitation structural conditions products used and all means to rid pests from establishment.Establishment must increase service be more aggressive in approach to rid pests.
code 35-6-501.111/.115** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Inadequate Facilities/Cooling Methods

Inspector note: Walk-in refridge at 48F.
code 04-3-501.15/4-301.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Food Protection

Inspector note: Uncovered fruits at bar.Properly cover.
code 08-3-305-307.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Hand Cleaner Drying Tissue Signage

Inspector note: No soap towels nor sinage at b-bar handsink c-bar handsink in kitchen.All handsinks need soap sinage and means of drying hands.
code 32-6-301.11-02.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
premises not properly maintained or cleaned

Official wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/Ceilings
Inspector note: Ceiling vent dusty at b-bar.
code 37-6-501.11-.12* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Fail on May 7, 2008: 5 findings appeared for the first time. 2 findings recurred. 6 previous findings did not recur.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Back Bay

See every restaurant in Back Bay →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.