?
La Motta
October 15, 2014 · Administrative record filed
🫥not rated
- official resultAdministrative record filed
- inspection typeEating & Drinking
- failed findings2
- critical findings0
📁 This is an administrative record, not a health inspection. It does not replace the restaurant's latest meaningful health result.
Failed findings
-
Non-Food Contact SurfacesInspector note: Walk in - Refinish rusted shelving.
-
premises not properly maintained or cleanedOfficial wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/CeilingsInspector note: Clean and refinish ceiling vent covers in dishwasher area. • Kitchen-clean vent filter in dishwasher vent hood.
Checks marked passed
-
Person in charge AssignedcriticalInspector note: Provide Certified Food Manager and allergy awareness certificates
-
Food Contact Surfaces CleanInspector note: Kitchen - clean slicer
-
Food ProtectionInspector note: Bar- Do not store liquor bottles in customer ice.
-
Equipment ThermometersInspector note: Kitchen -Provide thermometers where necessary.
-
Test Kit ProvidedInspector note: Bar- Provide test kit for dishwasher sanitizer.
-
Wiping Cloths Clean SanitizeInspector note: Keep wiping cloths in sanitizer between uses.
-
Non-Food Contact Surfaces CleanInspector note: Liquor/ food room -Clean shelving and refinish wood shelving.
-
Hand Cleaner Drying Tissue SignageInspector note: Kitchen -Provide paper towels for hand sink
-
Outside Storage Improperly MaintainedInspector note: clean rubbish storage area.
-
Inadequate LightingInspector note: Kitchen -replace any missing ceiling light shields.
-
Premises MaintainedInspector note: Kitchen Remove all unnecessary cardboard from walk in.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on October 7, 2014: 2 findings recurred. 11 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in South End
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.