✕

Las Vegas Express Restaurant

August 16, 2016 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
failed findings7
critical findings2

Failed findings

Hot Holdingcritical

Inspector note: Beef and vegetables stored at 127F. PIC will reheat and monitor.
code 03-3-501.16*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
PIC Performing Dutiescritical

Inspector note: PIC needs to post a copy of his Food Safety Certificate. It can not be used at two locations. Allergen was posted. PIC needs to moniotr general cleaning and repairs.
code M-2-103.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Food Protection

Inspector note: Food stored on the floor in walk. Must be stored 6 inches on the floor.
code 08-3-305-307.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Non-Food Contact Surfaces

Inspector note: Repair or replace gasket on freezer door. Address
code 15-4-202.16* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Non-Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: Clean wire shelves in walk in refrigerator. Visibly soiled.
code 23-4-602.13* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Improper Maintenance of Floors

Inspector note: Replace any broken or loose floor tiles in kitchen area.
code 36-6-501.11-.12* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
premises not properly maintained or cleaned

Official wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/Ceilings
Inspector note: Replace broken door to mop sink. Mop sink room next to clean equipment shelves. Address Clean ceiling fan in restroom. Visibly soiled.
code 37-6-501.11-.12* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Fail on March 14, 2016: 1 finding appeared for the first time. 6 findings recurred. 4 previous findings did not recur.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Mattapan

See every restaurant in Mattapan →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.