?
Melo's Market
December 31, 2008 · Administrative record filed
🫥not rated
- official resultAdministrative record filed
- inspection typeRetail Food
- failed findings3
- critical findings0
📁 This is an administrative record, not a health inspection. It does not replace the restaurant's latest meaningful health result.
Failed findings
-
Improper Maintenance of FloorsInspector note: Replace all broken floor tiles. • Clean floor throughout basement. • Clean floor under behind & besides all equipment refrigeration freezer units & shelving. • Dusty floor vent.
-
premises not properly maintained or cleanedOfficial wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/CeilingsInspector note: Replace all stained & broken ceiling tiles. Loose fitting ceiling tiles. • Clean ceiling fan & light shields. • Dusty ceiling vent
-
Rooms and Equipment VentedInspector note: vent not working
Checks marked passed
-
Food Contact Surfaces CleancriticalInspector note: provide proper method of sanitization of all food contacts.
-
PIC Performing DutiescriticalInspector note: All employees must be properly trained.
-
Food Contact Surfaces CleanInspector note: Provide proper method of cleaning all food contact surfaces.
-
Food ProtectionInspector note: Cashier cutting produce for customers.
-
Dishwashng FacilitiesInspector note: Provide proper Ware washing. Cutting produce.
-
Test Kit ProvidedInspector note: No test kit
-
Toilet Enclosed CleanInspector note: Door not self closing
-
Floors Designed Constructed InstalledInspector note: Floor behind counter not smooth durable easily cleanable & nonabsorbent - behind counter.
-
Premises MaintainedInspector note: Remove all unused unnecessary & broken equipment
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on December 5, 2008: 3 findings recurred. 9 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Mission Hill
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.