✕

Molly Moo's

April 15, 2016 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeEating & Drinking
failed findings2
critical findings1

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

Consumer Advisoriescritical

Inspector note: No allergen information on menu boards - provide where discussed during interview
code M-3-603.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Walls/Ceilings Designed Constructed Installed

Inspector note: Provide a barrier for the panini machines to reduce the potential contamination from customers using the rest room
code 37-6-201.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

Checks marked passed

Labeling of Ingredientscritical

Inspector note: Label frozen soups in one pound containers as discussed
code 01-3-602.11 B2*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Pass
Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: Clean grills of the panini machines as discussed
code 22-4-601/602.11** · serious findingstatus: Pass
Clean Cloths Hair Restraint

Inspector note: Straff shall have hair restraints when serving foods
code 13-2-304/402.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass
Non-Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: Clean all counters and exterior of all cold holding equipmemt from visible soils
code 23-4-602.13* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass
Single Service Articles Stored Dispensed

Inspector note: Store plastic spoons with handles facing outward as discussed
code 25-4-904.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass
Hand Cleaner Drying Tissue Signage

Inspector note: Replace paper towels at all locations where needsed
code 32-6-301.11-02.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Fail on April 8, 2016: 2 findings recurred. 6 previous findings did not recur.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in South Boston

See every restaurant in South Boston →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.