?

Mul's Diner

January 12, 2017 · Administrative record filed

🫥not rated

official resultAdministrative record filed
inspection typeEating & Drinking
failed findings3
critical findings0

📁 This is an administrative record, not a health inspection. It does not replace the restaurant's latest meaningful health result.

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

Non-Food Contact Surfaces

Inspector note: Resurface all wood not completely sealed either from chipping paint - rot or damaged • Sticker on hoo0d is expired - repair jagged edges of the hood cover where needed and remove all visibly charred areas
code 15-4-202.16* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Floors Designed Constructed Installed

Inspector note: Repair damaged areas of the floors where needed throughout the facility
code 36-6-201.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Walls/Ceilings Designed Constructed Installed

Inspector note: Repair damaged areas of the walls in the restaurant as discussed during inspection
code 37-6-201.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

Checks marked passed

PIC Performing Dutiescritical

Inspector note: Provide allergen awareness certification and post in a conspicuous location as discussed
code M-2-103.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Pass
Consumer Advisoriescritical

Inspector note: Provide proper consumer advisory on menu as discussed during inspection
code M-3-603.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Pass
Non-Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: Clean inside / outside of all refrigeration units as well as all cooking equipment from visible soils
code 23-4-602.13* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Fail on January 5, 2017: 1 finding appeared for the first time. 2 findings recurred. 3 previous findings did not recur.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Chinatown

See every restaurant in Chinatown →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.