✕
Petit Robert Bistro
August 12, 2008 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeEating & Drinking
- failed findings10
- critical findings5
Failed findings
-
Adequate Handwashing/Where/When/HowcriticalInspector note: Multiple staff observed wiping hands on aprons and/or cloth towels.
-
Prevention of Contamination from HandscriticalInspector note: Staff observed handling bread(rolls) with bare hands.
-
Location AccessiblecriticalInspector note: Staff observed using handsinks as utility sinks.
-
Separation/Sanitizer CriteriacriticalInspector note: Chemicals and food stored together in prep area by 3bay.
-
PIC Performing DutiescriticalInspector note: Staff on site not familar with requirements of food codes as evidenced by staff not knowledgeable about sanitizing procedure staff unaware of all of the time/temperature requirements and the Employee Health regulation.Pic unaware as well as staff onsite.Provide a certified food handler who is strong inall aspects of safe food principles/practices and train staff as often as necessary to ensure compliance with requirements of regulations.
-
Insects Rodents AnimalsInspector note: Evidence of fruit fly type pests at bar and kitchen areas.Provide an extermination report detailing activity sanitation and remedies.
-
Test Kit ProvidedInspector note: No test kit to test glasswasher at bar.
-
Hand Cleaner Drying Tissue SignageInspector note: No soap sinage at designated handsink at bar.
-
premises not properly maintained or cleanedOfficial wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/CeilingsInspector note: Ceiling and walls in Walk-in refridge dirty.
-
Fixture's not properly shieldedInspector note: Fixture in Walk-in not shielded.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Pass on April 7, 2008: 10 findings appeared for the first time.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.