✕
Starbucks Coffee No. 7804
September 10, 2024 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
- failed findings8
- critical findings1
Failed findings
-
Manual and Mechanical Warewashing Equipment Chemical Sanitization-Temperature pH Concentration and Hardness (P)criticalInspector note: Low temp dish washing 0 PPM Using 3 bay sink and dish washing company has been notified
-
Clean-up of Vomiting and Diarrheal Events (Pf)Inspector note: No written procedures for the clean up of vomiting and diarrheal events (information provided at this inspection and previous inspection) Kit missing items (reviewed with PIC)
-
(A) (B) and (C)(1) (4)-(16) Demonstration (Pf)Inspector note: No proof of full time on site certified food protection manager
-
Sanitizing Solutions Testing Devices (Pf)Inspector note: No chlorine test kit
-
Controlling Pests (Pf)Inspector note: Evidence of flies - Prep/Barista/ware washing and customer area Provide extermination and Intergrated pest management report prior to reinspection
-
Wiping Cloths Use Limitation (C)Inspector note: Wiping cloths not stored in a sanitizing solution Red wiping cloth bucket stored on floor behind counter
-
Floors Walls and Ceilings-Cleanability (C)Inspector note: Built up soils on floor under and behind all equipment - Storage ware washing prep etc through out Built up soils on exterior of grease trap - Ware washing area Built up soils on walls and attachments - Food storage ware washing prep areas Built up soils on ceiling and attachement - Food storage ware washing prep bathrooms
-
flagged at inspectionInspector note: CFPM must be certified in allergen awareness
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on January 31, 2024: 6 findings appeared for the first time. 2 findings recurred. 6 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Longwood
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.