✕

Tasca Restaurant

September 25, 2009 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeEating & Drinking
failed findings9
critical findings4

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

Hot Holdingcritical

Inspector note: Multiple food products stored without a heatsource at 100-110F.(Pork beef potato etc.).Insufficient means of hotholding.Provide additional equipment.
code 03-3-501.16*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Separation Segregation Cross Contaminationcritical

Inspector note: Raw shelled eggs stored over RTE foods in walk-in.
code 08-3-302.11/3-304.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Good Hygienic Practicescritical

Inspector note: Staff observed drinking from open cups.
code 12-2-401.11-.12*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Labeled Common Namecritical

Inspector note: Chemical bottle(s) not labeled properly with common name.
code 41-7-102.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Insects Rodents Animals

Inspector note: Moderate to heavy issue with fruit fly and house fly with no documentation from exterminator.
code 35-6-501.111/.115** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Non-Food Contact Surfaces

Inspector note: Shelving door in Walk-in rusted worn.Multiple coffin freezer lids in disrepair.
code 15-4-202.16* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Non-Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: Equipment dirty(microwave etc.).
code 23-4-602.13* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Installed and Maintained

Inspector note: Equipment leaking into basement.Repair leaks from AC etc.
code 29-5-201/02.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Hand Cleaner Drying Tissue Signage

Inspector note: No soap nor paper towel at multiple handsinks.
code 32-6-301.11-02.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Brighton

See every restaurant in Brighton →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.