✕

The Galley Diner

August 1, 2014 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeEating & Drinking
failed findings8
critical findings1

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

Toxic Items: Original Containercritical

Inspector note: remove all painting supplies stored in the kitchen.
code 41-7-101.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: clean all cooking equipment in kitchen and at the service area.
code 22-4-601/602.11** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Food Contact Surfaces Design

Inspector note: replacde worn and stained cutting board tables in kitchen.
code 14-4-202.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Non-Food Contact Surfaces

Inspector note: repair door to refrigerator next to the restroom. Door handle is broken. Replace worn and heavily soiled pot holders in kitchen.
code 15-4-202.16* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Test Kit Provided

Inspector note: provide test kit for measuring the sanitizer strength at the 3 compartment sink.
code 17-4-302.14* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Wiping Cloths Clean Sanitize

Inspector note: provide proper storage of wiping cloths. Keep in a sanitizing solution when not in use.
code 21-3-304.14* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Non-Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: clean exterior of all surfaces in the kitchen area. Clean exterior of the microwave electical panel doors etc.
code 23-4-602.13* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Walls/Ceilings Designed Constructed Installed

Inspector note: repair wall covering behind stove. Wall covering has broken away from the wall.
code 37-6-201.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Fail on July 17, 2014: 8 findings recurred.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in South Boston

See every restaurant in South Boston →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.