Wagamama

• official resultFail
• resultFail
• inspection typeEating & Drinking
• failed findings7
• critical findings2

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

• ⚠️Packaged and Unpackaged Food-Separation Packaging and Segregation (P)critical
  Inspector note: Observed raw animal products stored above ready to eat foods on production line. Person in charge corrected.
  code 590.003/3-302.11-P*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
• ⚠️(A)(1) Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food Hot and Cold Holding (P)critical
  Inspector note: Rice in one of the production line rice cookers at 120F for unknown time. Person in charge discarded. Rice in diffrent rice cookers at acceptable temperature.
  code 590.003/3-501.16-P1*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
• ⚠️Segregation and Location-Distressed Merchandise (Pf)
  Inspector note: Observed multiple juices at bar that were out of date and soiled. Person in charge discarded.
  code 590.006/6-404.11-PF** · serious findingstatus: Fail
• ⚠️Controlling Pests (Pf)
  Inspector note: Observed rodent droppings inside dry store room. Provide updated pest reports.
  code 590.006/6-501.111-PF** · serious findingstatus: Fail
• ⚠️Common Name-Working Containers (Pf)
  Inspector note: Observed unlabled chemical bottle in employee bathroom. Provide label
  code 590.007/7-102.11-PF** · serious findingstatus: Fail
• ⚠️In-Use Utensils Between-Use Storage (C)
  Inspector note: Dipper well at bar not on and utensils stored in stagnet water. Discontinue
  code 590.003/3-304.12-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
• ⚠️Nonfood Contact Surfaces (C)
  Inspector note: Under bar dump sink is soiled. Clean to remove soils.
  code 590.004/4-602.13-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Pass on December 7, 2022: 7 findings appeared for the first time.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.