?
Yamato Ii
December 9, 2025 · Administrative hearing
🫥not rated
- official resultAdministrative hearing
- inspection typeEating & Drinking
- failed findings2
- critical findings0
📁 This is an administrative record, not a health inspection. It does not replace the restaurant's latest meaningful health result.
Failed findings
-
Controlling Pests (Pf)Inspector note: What appears to be rat droppings behind equipment at bar inside and around wall cut out and floor what appears to be rat droppings behind coffin freezer in kitchen in corner on floor near wait station. Clean and sanitize all affected areas. Provide an updated IPM pest control report post dated after today upon re inspection. PIC was actively cleaning and sanitizing areas with droppings during inspection. Recent pest report dated 12/5/25 with open conditions listed. Provide updated pest report stating issues have been corrected.
-
Outer Openings Protected (C)Inspector note: Baseboard with disturbed wall material. Treat and seal. Hole noted on recent IPM report from Orkin dated 12/5/25 in wall behind bar
Checks marked passed
-
Safe Unadulterated and Honestly Presented (P)criticalInspector note: 50 lbs bag of rice with what appears to be mice gnaw marks and compromised packaging. Product was voluntarily discarded.
-
Assignment (Pf)Inspector note: No PIC assigned. Provide properly trained person in charge during all hours of operation. Food employee on sight offered translation from english to chinese for staff to implement corrective actions.
-
Ready-To-Eat Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food Date Marking (Pf)Inspector note: Numerous pans of prepared TCS foods in walkin cooler not dated or labeled. Provide.
-
Nonfood Contact Surfaces (C)Inspector note: Shelving behind sushi bar with visible soils. HVAC vent in locker room with dust and soils Wait station shelves dusty soils. Clean to remove.
-
Anti-ChokingInspector note: Choke save posted is expired. Provide current. 590.011: Additional Requirements (A) Anti-choking Procedures in Food Service Establishments. (1) Pursuant to M.G.L. c. 94 § 305D restaurants with a certain seating capacity are required to have one or more employees trained in a manual choke-saving procedure in accordance with 105 CMR 605.000: Approved Choke-saving Procedures. (2) Each food service establishment with a seating capacity that conforms with M.G.L. c. 94 § 305D shall: (a) Have on its premises while food is being served an employee trained in manual procedures approved by the Department to remove food lodged in a person's throat; and (b) Make adequate provision for insurance to cover employees trained in rendering such assistance.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on December 2, 2025: 2 findings recurred. 5 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Back Bay
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.