✕
Starbucks Coffee #2370
June 20, 2011 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeComplaint
- failed findings4
- critical findings0
Failed findings
-
toxic items stored near foodOfficial wording: No Evidence Of Rodent Or Insect Outer Openings Protected/Rodent Proofed, A Written Log Shall Be Maintained Available To The InspectorsInspector note: All necessary control measures shall be used to effectively minimize or eliminate the presence of rodents, roaches, and other vermin and insects on the premises of all food establishments, in food-transporting vehicles, and in vending machines.//OBSERVE FRONT DOOR NOT RODENT & INSECT PROOF DOOR HAS 1/4"-1" GAP BETWEEN FRONT DOORS.
-
hot/cold holding temps offOfficial wording: * Certified Food Manager On Site When Potentially Hazardous Foods Are Prepared And ServedInspector note: A certified food service manager must be present in all establishments at which potentially hazardous food is prepared or served.//NO PERSON ON PREMISES WITH A CITY FOOD SANITATION AT THIS TIME OF OPERATION POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS FOODS.
-
food prep surfaces dirtyOfficial wording: Food And Non-Food Contact Equipment Utensils Clean, Free Of Abrasive DetergentsInspector note: All food and non-food contact surfaces of equipment and all food storage utensils shall be thoroughly cleaned and sanitized daily.//SOME SHELVES IN COOLERS DRY STORAGE NEED CLEANING
-
Floors: Constructed Per Code, Cleaned, Good Repair, Coving Installed, Dust-Less Cleaning Methods UsedInspector note: The floors shall be constructed per code, be smooth and easily cleaned, and be kept clean and in good repair.//FLOORS UNDER & AROUND STOCK NEED CLEANING.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Pass w/ Conditions on January 24, 2011: 4 findings appeared for the first time. 1 previous finding did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Lincoln Park
About this record
This record comes from Chicago Department of Public Health. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Chicago Data Portal.