?
Cafe De Lulu
October 20, 2014 · Administrative record filed
🫥not rated
- official resultAdministrative record filed
- inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
- failed findings3
- critical findings0
📁 This is an administrative record, not a health inspection. It does not replace the restaurant's latest meaningful health result.
Failed findings
-
Walls/Ceilings Designed Constructed InstalledInspector note: Clean ceiling light fixtures and all attachments free of built up soils throughout Clean walls & all attachments resurface where needed.
-
Premises MaintainedInspector note: Remove all unused unnecessary articles and equipment from premises. • Remove personal items from wait station. Remove items from hallway
-
Anti-Choking
Checks marked passed
-
Toxic Items: Original ContainercriticalInspector note: Toxic Chemical missing original label
-
Insects Rodents AnimalsInspector note: Evidence of flies Provide full extermination prior to reinspection
-
Food ProtectionInspector note: Food products stored on floor - Must be stored 6" above the floor. Using milk crates to store products and shelving - Discard. Remove items from above ice machine.
-
Non-Food Contact SurfacesInspector note: Raise all items 6" above the floor on shelving
-
Wiping Cloths Clean SanitizeInspector note: Wiping cloths not stored in a sanitizing solution
-
Non-Food Contact Surfaces CleanInspector note: Clean all shelving cooking equipment etc. free of built up soils.
-
Clean Equipment & Utensils StorageInspector note: Properly store all pots. pans etc 6'' above the floor.
-
Floors Designed Constructed InstalledInspector note: Clean floor under and behind all equipment
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on September 25, 2014: 3 findings recurred. 12 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Downtown
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.