✕

Cafe Podima

March 21, 2014 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
failed findings8
critical findings2

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

Hot Holdingcritical

Inspector note: cooked chicken on counter @ 130f -133f ensure proper hot hold of 140f or above
code 03-3-501.16*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Location Accessiblecritical

Inspector note: Hand sink @ front counter blocked allow proper access to properly wash hands
code 31-5-204/05.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: 1) slicer with old soils clean to remove 2) mixer with old soils clean to remove 3) can opener with old soils clean to remove
code 22-4-601/602.11** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Installed and Maintained

Inspector note: sink not draining properly repair
code 29-5-201/02.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Hand Cleaner Drying Tissue Signage

Inspector note: 1) no hand soap @ 2 hand sinks supply 2) no paper towels @ hand sink supply 3) no hand signage @ hand sinks supply
code 32-6-301.11-02.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Improper Maintenance of Floors

Inspector note: floors with debris and soils clean to remove
code 36-6-501.11-.12* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
premises not properly maintained or cleaned

Official wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/Ceilings
Inspector note: walls with soils and dusts clean to remove
code 37-6-501.11-.12* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Premises Maintained

Inspector note: lumber and drywall in kitchen area remove
code 42-6-501.113/.114* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Pass on October 29, 2013: 8 findings appeared for the first time.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Beacon Hill

See every restaurant in Beacon Hill →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.