✕
Central Wharf Co.
November 21, 2011 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeEating & Drinking
- failed findings9
- critical findings3
Failed findings
-
Hot HoldingcriticalInspector note: Rice holding at 120F(Double pan in water table(?)??????????Provide minimum of 140F for all foods hot holding.
-
Separation Segregation Cross ContaminationcriticalInspector note: Multiple different foods in same bucket in walk-in.Properly seperate.
-
PIC KnowledgecriticalInspector note: Newer PIC onsite at location.Unable to explain type of sanitizer used onsite.Not knowledgeable about Employee Health Policy.Please ensure that PIC is knowledgeable about basic safe food principles and practices as well as actively managing staff onsite(No dumping in handsinks etc.).Specials menu doesn't have allergy signage on it.Provide on all menus and all menu boards.
-
Food Utensil StorageInspector note: Use of non handled utensil to dispense bulk foods.Provide a handled utensil for all bulk foods and ice.
-
Test Kit ProvidedInspector note: Test kit not available to test dishwashers and/or glasswashers.Provide.
-
Installed and MaintainedInspector note: Hot water at handsinks too hot too touch(Registered 130F).Code requirement is 110F.
-
Hand Cleaner Drying Tissue SignageInspector note: No soap signage nor paper towels at upstairs bar.Handsink in Mens room broken.Toilet clogged.Clean and repair.Toilet on 1st floor overflown.Repair(Ongoing onsite).
-
Improper Maintenance of FloorsInspector note: Worn floor on 2nd floor dance floor.
-
premises not properly maintained or cleanedOfficial wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/CeilingsInspector note: Hotline hood service has expired again(refer to BFD)Repeat violation.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Pass on March 7, 2011: 9 findings appeared for the first time.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Downtown
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.