✕
Giacomo's Restaurant
September 9, 2008 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeEating & Drinking
- failed findings8
- critical findings1
Failed findings
-
PIC Performing DutiescriticalInspector note: PIC on site not knowledgeable about warewashing procedures(sanitizer usage recommended concentration etc.).PIC not ensuring food safety by using non-approved storage containers even after subject was noted on prior inspection.PIC unsure of temperature requirements.Please review sinage posted and educate accordingly.
-
Food ProtectionInspector note: Use ofnon-food grade storage containers in dry storage and refridge.Management was told on prior inspection not to use.Discard all non food containers and supply approved containers for use.
-
Food Utensil StorageInspector note: Utensils hanging off ansul pipes at hood.
-
Food Contact Surfaces DesignInspector note: Badly worn pots used at hotline.Cylinder collanders(metal) are cracked and worn.Discard.
-
Test Kit ProvidedInspector note: Worn quat test kit on site.No test kit available for chlorine dishwasher.Provide.
-
Floors Designed Constructed InstalledInspector note: Floors dirty.Provide extermination reports.
-
Walls/Ceilings Designed Constructed InstalledInspector note: Tile missing from dry storage ceiling.Product stored under area and has cement dust and other contaminent on products.Clean sanitize product before opening if applicable.If product can't be salvaged then discard.
-
premises not properly maintained or cleanedOfficial wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/CeilingsInspector note: Insufficient documentation posted at hood for cleaning of duct work.No year posted and sinage indicates unaccessable area's.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Pass on May 22, 2008: 8 findings appeared for the first time.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in South End
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.