✕
Ginger Exchange
January 14, 2016 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeEating & Drinking
- failed findings6
- critical findings2
Failed findings
-
Food Contact Surfaces CleancriticalInspector note: There is no sanitizer reading in the low temperature dishwasher. Provide proper sanitizer levels to ensure that equipment is getting cleaned and sanitized. (The three compartment sink was setup with 200 ppm so the dishes can be washed by hand)
-
Conformance w/ Approved ProcedurescriticalInspector note: The HACCP plan is missing some information there is no recipe for the sushi rice calibration procedures corrective actions etc. Submit an updated HACCP plan to the board of health for approval. The sushi rice tested at 4.4 originally. The sushi chef was unable to take corretive action. After the meter was calibrated and the sample was prepared properly the sushi rice tested at 4.1 the lab test has a result of 4.0. The logs have sushi pH values of to the hundreth but the meter only tests to the tenth. Provide accurate logs and train sushi employees in updated HACCP plan procedures.
-
Insects Rodents AnimalsInspector note: There was a cockroach on the door of the bathroom they are not using an exterminator to treat for pests. Provide treatment by a licensed exterminator.
-
Non-Food Contact SurfacesInspector note: The counter at the handsink in the waitress area is damaged. Repair or replace.
-
Improper Maintenance of FloorsInspector note: There is food buildup under equipment. Clean to remove.
-
premises not properly maintained or cleanedOfficial wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/CeilingsInspector note: There is grease buildup in between cooking equipment. Clean to remove.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Pass on April 2, 2015: 6 findings appeared for the first time.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in South End
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.