✕

Navarrete Restaurant

October 1, 2010 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
failed findings5
critical findings1

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

Cold Holdingcritical

Inspector note: Cooked Pigs feet soup and beef at 55F. PIC stated the food had been our of temperature for around an hour and half. PIC removed foods and placed them in a refrigerator to maintain a temperature of 41F and below. Cooked pig feet and pork chops at 55F. PIC stated itbhad been in the refrigerator for over 15hrs.. PIC voluntarily disposed and denatured at time of inspection.
code 03-3-501.16(A)*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: White cutting board in kitchen area visibly scoared and soiled. Clean to remove or replace
code 22-4-601/602.11** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Non-Food Contact Surfaces

Inspector note: Refrigeration unit in kitchen. Repair or replace. Discontinue use until able to maintain a temperature of 41F and below. Freezer door in basement in dis-repair. Address.
code 15-4-202.16* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Non-Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: Exxess water on shelves of cold holding unit at front service area. Clean to remove. Interior of coffin style freezer with excess frost build-up. Defrost and clean to remove. Shelf storing salt and canned visibly soiled. Clean to remove or resurface.
code 23-4-602.13* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Installed and Maintained

Inspector note: Hand sink in service area not operating properly. Repair or replace.
code 29-5-201/02.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Pass on June 29, 2010: 5 findings appeared for the first time.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Roxbury

See every restaurant in Roxbury →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.