✕

Otto Pizza

February 2, 2022 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeEating & Drinking
failed findings5
critical findings1

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

Separation-Storage (P)critical

Inspector note: Pack of cigarettes observed stored on clean equipment storage rack. COS.
code 590.007/7-201.11-P*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Time as a Public Health Control ( Pf)

Inspector note: Establishment is using time rather than temperature to hold pizza slices. No time stamps on pizzas on shelf. Discontinue process until detailed procedures are submitted to ISD health division for review. Pizza rethermalized and served for immediate service. COS.
code 590.003(D)/3-501.19-PF** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Packaged and Unpackaged Food-Separation Packaging and Segregation (C)

Inspector note: Pizza display behind service counter shelving offers no overhead protection. Provide proper food protection.
code 590.003/3-302.11-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Warewashing Sinks and Drain boards Self-Draining (C)

Inspector note: Three compartment sink has broken seams in need of welding or repair currently patched with duct tape. Make all necessary repairs.
code 590.004/4-204.119-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Surface Characteristics-Indoor Areas (C)

Inspector note: Floors in basement storage room with broken compromised surfaces. Walkin cooler floor with exposed concrete. Make all necessary repairs. Broken pipe insulation in ceiling around HVAC duct pipe. Repair.
code 590.006/6-101.11-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Fail on October 25, 2021: 5 findings appeared for the first time. 2 previous findings did not recur.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in South Boston Waterfront

See every restaurant in South Boston Waterfront →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.