✓
Star Market No. 4587
February 6, 2012 · Pass
😇clean
- official resultPass
- resultPass
- inspection typeRetail Food
- failed findings0
- critical findings0
✓ No failed findings were recorded; 6 code checks were marked passed.
Checks marked passed
-
Separation Segregation Cross ContaminationcriticalInspector note: Poultry product stored over pork in Meat Dept. refrigeration and Poultry stored together with ground meat(??)>Properly segregate and store appropriately.
-
Hot and Cold WatercriticalInspector note: No hot water from handsink in seafood department.Sink run for several minutes.Notes:Sink leaking and 3bay sink adjacent to handsink had hot water instantaneous(?).Store manager called for service and service people on way.Please have staff communicate when a peice of equipment is in need of repair(?)>Reminder:No hot water at handsink could result in a suspension of business within that Dept until remedied!!
-
Food Contact Surfaces CleanInspector note: Lobster tank visibly dirty.Please clean(Protocol on cleaning schedule??).Reminder:Shellstock tags must be kept for 90days in chronological order.Metal stem thermometer for staff??Backflow preventer for hosehook up under sink(?).Provide.
-
Clean Cloths Hair RestraintInspector note: Staff in food service areas not wearing hair restraints(?).Provide
-
Non-Food Contact Surfaces CleanInspector note: Some ceiling air vents on fans in Refrigerated units need to be cleaned.Most are in good shape.Discussed with store mgr the need to clean ceiling duct work on top of ducts.Visible dust seen from floor levels-throughout(Mgr indicates that service will be done in summer(OK)).
-
Installed and MaintainedInspector note: Handsink at seafood department leaking.Repair
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on January 27, 2012: 6 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in South Boston
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.