✕

The Charles River Bistro

June 28, 2016 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
failed findings7
critical findings2

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

Cold Holdingcritical

Inspector note: Raw Chicken 56F.Maintain all cold holding 41F or below.PIC removed product to alternate refrigeration.
code 03-3-501.16(A)*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
PIC Performing Dutiescritical

Inspector note: Provide full time employee CFPM certification on site.
code M-2-103.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Clean Cloths Hair Restraint

Inspector note: Provide proper hair restraints for staff.
code 13-2-304/402.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Non-Food Contact Surfaces

Inspector note: True upright refrigeration unit reading 48F.Repair.maintain unit 41F or below.
code 15-4-202.16* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Non-Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: Clean exterior of igloo ice storage container. • Clean interior of microwave oven.
code 23-4-602.13* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Single Service Articles Stored Dispensed

Inspector note: Self service condiment area/Disposable wares area soiled.Discontinue using outside area.PIC will find alternate location so proper food protection can be monitored by staff.PIC removed all product from table outside to interior front counter permenant solution is implemented.
code 25-4-904.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Premises Maintained

Inspector note: Interior of outside storage trailors soiled.Maintain Clean & Organized
code 42-6-501.113/.114* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Pass on June 26, 2015: 7 findings appeared for the first time.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Beacon Hill

See every restaurant in Beacon Hill →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.