✕

Burger King #1250

June 11, 2014 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeCanvass
failed findings5
critical findings1

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

food from a questionable sourcecritical

Official wording: Adequate Number, Convenient, Accessible, Designed, And Maintained
Inspector note: UPON ENTERING PREMISES THE HOT WATER WAS TURNED OFF AT THE EXPOSED HANDSINK AT THE DRIVE THRU STATION,DUE TO WATER LEAKING HEAVILY FROM PIPE WHEN WATER IS TURNED ON. THE ABOVE HAS BUCKETS UNDERNEATH SINK TO CATCH WATER AND WHEN BUCKET IS FILLED UP WATER RUNS ONTO FLOOR. MUST REPAIR SINK. CRITICAL VIOLATION 7-38-030.
code 11Priority
hot/cold holding temps off

Official wording: * Certified Food Manager On Site When Potentially Hazardous Foods Are Prepared And Served
Inspector note: NO CERTIFIED FOOD MANAGER ON SITE WHILE POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS FOODS ARE PREPARED OR SERVED,SUCH AS EGGS,HAMBURGER AND SAUSAGES,SERIOUS VIOLATION 7-38-012
code 21
food prep surfaces dirty

Official wording: Food And Non-Food Contact Equipment Utensils Clean, Free Of Abrasive Detergents
Inspector note: CLEAN BOTTOM COMPARTMENT OF DEEP FRYERS,HAS HEAVY GREASE BUILD-UP INSIDE COMPARTMENTS,INSTRUCTED TO CLEAN AND MAINTAIN EQUIPMENT
code 33
Floors: Constructed Per Code, Cleaned, Good Repair, Coving Installed, Dust-Less Cleaning Methods Used

Inspector note: CLEAN THE FLOORS IN REAR STORAGE AREA,ALONG WALL BASE AND CORNERS
code 34
Walls, Ceilings, Attached Equipment Constructed Per Code: Good Repair, Surfaces Clean And Dust-Less Cleaning Methods

Inspector note: (1) CEILING TILE NEED TO BE INSTALLED IN THE REAR STORAGE AREA,MUST PROVIDE
code 35

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Pass w/ Conditions on May 28, 2013: 1 finding appeared for the first time. 4 findings recurred.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Chatham

See every restaurant in Chatham →

About this record

This record comes from Chicago Department of Public Health. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Chicago Data Portal.