✕
Boston Market
January 2, 2019 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
- failed findings6
- critical findings2
Failed findings
-
Hot HoldingcriticalInspector note: Cooked ribs inside of the front service steam at 95F. Discontinue and ensure all potentially hazardous foods are maintaine at 140F and above. Ribs to be reheated to 165F to ensure no bacterial growth. Rotisserie chicken inside of the Alto-Shaam heating unit at 110F. Discontinue and ensure all potentially hazardous foods are being maintained at 140F and above. All other foods inside of the unit were at the appropriate hot holding temperature.
-
PIC KnowledgecriticalInspector note: No one on site with a current Food Allergen/Safety Certification. Provide at least one full time employee who has a Food Allergern Certification and has been enrolled in some form of Food Safety Certification prior to the re-inspection being completed.
-
Food Container LabelsInspector note: Several squeeze bottles with dressing have no labels. Provide.
-
Food Contact Surfaces DesignInspector note: Large cutting board in the back preparation room heavily scoared and visibly soiled. Either resurface or replace.
-
Non-Food Contact Surfaces CleanInspector note: Exterior of the Hobart stand mixer visibly soiled and with cacked on foods. Clean to remove. Interior/extreior of the Blodgett ovens in the back preparation room with excess carbon build-up. Clean to remove.
-
Improper Maintenance of FloorsInspector note: Floor of the walk-in freezer with excess ice build-up. Defrost and clean to remove. Floor around the Hobart stand mixer with food debris and visibly soiled. Clean to remove.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on July 13, 2018: 6 findings appeared for the first time. 2 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Dorchester
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.